50% Off/-

50% Off/-


50% Off/-

50% Off/-


50% Off/-

50% Off/-

Hibernate Session Commit Rollback Save Concepts

What is Hibernate Session?

A Session is used to get a physical connection with a database. The Session object is lightweight and designed to be instantiated each time an interaction is needed with the database. Persistent objects are saved and retrieved through a Session object.

The session objects should not be kept open for a long time because they are not usually thread safe and they should be created and destroyed them as needed. The main function of the Session is to offer create, read and delete operations for instances of mapped entity classes. Instances may exist in one of the following three states at a given point in time:

transient: A new instance of a a persistent class which is not associated with a Session and has no representation in the database and no identifier value is considered transient by Hibernate.

persistent: You can make a transient instance persistent by associating it with a Session. A persistent instance has a representation in the database, an identifier value and is associated with a Session.

detached: Once we close the Hibernate Session, the persistent instance will become a detached instance.

A Session instance is serializable if its persistent classes are serializable. A typical transaction should use the following idiom:
Session session = factory.openSession();
Transaction tx = null;
try {
   tx = session.beginTransaction();
   // do some work
catch (Exception e) {
   if (tx!=null) tx.rollback();
}finally {

If the Session throws an exception, the transaction must be rolled back and the session must be discarded.


I have been confused about transaction.rollback. Here is example pseudocode:
transaction = session.beginTransaction()    
EntityA a = new EntityA();    

What happens when this code works? Do I have the entity in the database or not?


When you call session.save(a) Hibernate basically remembers somewhere inside session that this object has to be saved. It can decide if he wants to issue INSERT INTO... immediately, some time later or on commit. This is a performance improvement, allowing Hibernate to batch inserts or avoid them if transaction is rolled back.

When you call session.flush(), Hibernate is forced to issue INSERT INTO... against the database. The entity is stored in the database, but not yet committed. Depending on transaction isolation level it won't be seen by other running transactions. But now the database knows about the record. What session.flush() does is to empty the internal SQL instructions cache, and execute it immediately to the database.

When you call transaction.rollback(), Hibernate rolls-back the database transaction. Database handles rollback, thus removing newly created object.

Now consider the scenario without flush(). First of all, you never touch the database so the performance is better and rollback is basically a no-op. On the other hand if transaction isolation level is READUNCOMMITTED, other transactions can see inserted record even before commit/rollback. Without flush() this won't happen, unless Hibernate does not decide to flush() implicitly.


I googled a lot and read about org.hibernate.Transaction.commit() and org.hibernate.Session.flush() a lot, know purpose of each method, but still have a question.

Is it good practice to call org.hibernate.Session.flush() method by hand? As said in org.hibernate.Session docs,
Must be called at the end of a unit of work, before committing the transaction and closing 
the session (depending on flush-mode, Transaction.commit() calls this method).

Could you explain me purpose of calling org.hibernate.Session.flush() by hand if org.hibernate.Transaction.commit() will call it automatically?


In the Hibernate Manual you can see this example:
Session session = sessionFactory.openSession();
Transaction tx = session.beginTransaction();
for ( int i=0; i<100000; i++ ) {
    Customer customer = new Customer(.....);
    if ( i % 20 == 0 ) { //20, same as the JDBC batch size
        //flush a batch of inserts and release memory:

Without the call to the flush method, your first-level cache would throw an OutOfMemoryException


When we are updating a record, we can use session.flush() with Hibernate. What's the need for flush()?


Flushing the session forces Hibernate to synchronize the in-memory state of the Session with the database (i.e. to write changes to the database). By default, Hibernate will flush changes automatically for you:
  • before some query executions
  • when a transaction is committed
Allowing to explicitly flush the Session gives finer control that may be required in some circumstances (to get an ID assigned, to control the size of the Session,... ).

If FlushMode.AUTO is set, will Hibernate flush my updated persistent object when I call session.close()?

I know that session.close() does not normally flush the session but I'm not sure how FlushMode.AUTO affects this.

From the Docs:

The Session is sometimes flushed before query execution in order to ensure that queries never return stale state. This is the default flush mode.

Does this mean I can rely on Hibernate to verify my changes are flushed sometimes before my session is closed?

Small code example:
Session session = HibernateSessionFactory.getSession();  
PersistedObject p = session.get(PersistedObject.class,id);  


Will Hibernate flush my updated persistent object when calling session.close() (using FlushMode.AUTO)?

No it won't, and you should use a transaction with well defined boundaries. Quoting Non-transactional data access and the auto-commit mode: Working nontransactionally with Hibernate Look at the following code, which accesses the database without transaction boundaries:
Session session = sessionFactory.openSession(); 
session.get(Item.class, 123l); 

By default, in a Java SE environment with a JDBC configuration, this is what happens if you execute this snippet:

1. A new Session is opened. It doesn’t obtain a database connection at this point.
2. The call to get() triggers an SQL SELECT. The Session now obtains a JDBC Connection from the connection pool. Hibernate, by default, immediately turns off the autocommit mode on this connection with setAutoCommit(false). This effectively starts a JDBC transaction!
3. The SELECT is executed inside this JDBC transaction. The Session is closed, and the connection is returned to the pool and released by Hibernate — Hibernate calls close() on the JDBC Connection.

What happens to the uncommitted transaction?

The answer to that question is, "It depends!" The JDBC specification doesn’t say anything about pending transactions when close() is called on a connection. What happens depends on how the vendors implement the specification. With Oracle JDBC drivers, for example, the call to close() commits the transaction! Most other JDBC vendors take the sane route and roll back any pending transaction when the JDBC Connection object is closed and the resource is returned to the pool.

Obviously, this won’t be a problem for the SELECT you’ve executed, but look at this variation:
Session session = getSessionFactory().openSession(); 
Long generatedId = session.save(item); 

This code results in an INSERT statement, executed inside a transaction that is never committed or rolled back. On Oracle, this piece of code inserts data permanently; in other databases, it may not. (This situation is slightly more complicated: The INSERT is executed only if the identifier generator requires it. For example, an identifier value can be obtained from a sequence without an INSERT. The persistent entity is then queued until flush-time insertion — which never happens in this code. An identity strategy requires an immediate INSERT for the value to be generated.)

Result: use explicit transaction demarcation.

© 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Codesenior.COM